Google Adwords: Legal Issues – TYPOSQUATTING
Generally, Typosquatting, also known as URL hijacking, is an act of purchasing a domain name that is a variation on a popular domain name with the expectation that the site will get traffic off of the original site because of a user’s misspelling of the name. For example, registering the domain names webapedia.com or yahooo.com in the hopes that someone making a typo will get to that site unexpectedly. Now, Google may earn as much as $497m a year from typosquatters, according to a study from Harvard professor and noted Mountain View critic Ben Edelman. They estimate that at least 938,000 domains are typosquatting on the top 3,264 “.com” websites, waiting for unsuspecting web users to mistype or misspell a url. And 57 per cent of these “mispelled” domains, they say, include Google pay-per-click ads.
A detailed document for identifying “typosquatting” may be found by clicking here.
As we know, Google offers a service known as “AdSense for Domains,” which is specifically designed to enable so-called “parked domains” – domains that do little more than serve ads. Mountain View’s terms of service prohibit trademark violations – which includes typosquatting, a practice that goes against US law – and the company says it will remove violating domains if it finds them or is “made aware of” them.
But despite this policy, it is contended that Google is harboring thousands of these domains – and pocketing some serious revenue as a result. After crawling more than 285,000 typo domains to analyze their revenue sources, they found that around 80 per cent were supported by pay-per-click ads, and it’s no surprise that Google ads were by far the most prevalent.
Pulling in traffic data from Alexa – and extrapolating their numbers across the top 100,000 sites – the Harvard pair estimate that typosquatting domains receive at least 68.2 million hits a day. “If these typo domains were treated as a single website, that site would be ranked by Alexa as the 10th most popular website in the world,” they write, “It would be more popular, in unique daily visitors, than Twitter.com, Myspace.com, or Amazon.com.”
Google doen’t disclose revenues from AdSense for Domains, but Edelman and Moore use third-party studies to estimate that Google’s average revenue per mispelled domain visit is around 3.5 cents. With their crawls indicating that Google ads are used on about 57 per cent of typo domains, they say that Mountain View is pulling in about $497m from ad partners typosquatting on the top 100,000 websites. They also say that of the typo domains showing Google ads, 63 per cent are using one of just five advertising IDs. In other words, the practice could be significantly reduced by knocking out just five ad accounts.
Furthermore, in the United States, the 1999 Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) contains a clause (Section 3(a), amending 15 USC 1117 to include sub-section (d)(2)(B)(ii)) aimed at combatting typosquatting
Keep looking for future posts. Cheers :)