Intellectual Property Strategy * IPR Attorneys & Patent Research Lawyers

Home » Information Technology (IT) » Issues faced by Patent Agents in India

Issues faced by Patent Agents in India

Law Firms in India offers full service law firm services,attorneys in India, law firm for corporate laws in India, business law attorneys in India, law firms in delhi, attorneys in Delhi, corporate law firms in India

Ever since I appeared for the patent agent examination, way back in 2006, I have experienced numerous situations, which made me realize that issues faced by a patent agent, in India, are not so rare.
One of the major issues revolves around the use of terms, “Patent Agent”, and “Patent Attorney”, since the term “Patent Attorney” has not been defined specifically by law. However, it is pretty clear that such term shall only be used when one is a registered patent agent, as well as an advocate enrolled in the bar council.
Another issue comes into picture while considering the importance of scientific / technical educational background of the patent agent. As most of us are aware, these days, only science graduates are eligible to appear for the patent agent exam, and there exist a considerable number of patent agents who are lawyers, but do not have a scientific / technical educational background, and are registered according to the earlier provisions of the patent law.
I believe that presence of such lawyers is a boon to India, as it paves way for effective patent prosecution, litigation and enforcement of related rights.
However, I would like to stress on the importance of scientific / technical educational background in our profession. There are frequent situations wherein even a bit of technical expertise drastically improves the scope of a patent application. For example, in 2004, in Chef America v. Lamb-Weston, the Federal Circuit had to interpret the meaning of the phrase “heating the resulting batter-coated dough to a temperature in the range of about 400° F. to 850° F.”
Imagine, how the entire meaning of the phrase had changed, if it would have been “heating the oven to a temperature in the range of about 400° F. to 850° F.” The literal meaning of the original phrase was that it required the internal temperature of the dough to reach between 400° F. to 850° F., which gave a very narrow protection to the patent owner.
Another important issue faced by patent agents is a kind of discrimination between patent agents and patent attorneys over various public forums. For example, recently browsing through questions asked on LinkedIn, I observed a question regarding implications of attorney-client privilege in India, wherein certain foreign attorneys mentioned that Indian advocates are bound by such privilege, whereas patent agents are not.
What hurt me most was the fact that certain Indian patent agents, who recently completed their law studies, and are enrolled as advocates, voiced the same opinion, in the same tone (rather harsher), and mentioned that it is always better to deal with patent attorneys, rather than patent agents. While browsing the profile of such person, I came to know that he is also a registered patent agent, had a technical background, and recently completed his law.
I am also pursuing law studies, but not with an aim of becoming a patent attorney, and disgracing my fellow patent agents publicly. As an Indian patent agent, one could have answered that question sensibly by mentioning that though such privilege does not exist for patent agents, however, as an alternative they can be bound by strict NDAs and other agreements, which would be governed by contract law, and other related laws of India, hence addressing the issue to some extent, instead of joining the league of foreign attorneys to thrash Indian patent agents publicly.
I think a possible way to address a majority of these issues is to change our own perspective of viewing this profession of patent agents, giving more respect to it, and addressing the issues rather than criticizing those again and again.

Advertisements

3 Comments

  1. Arjun says:

    Dear Rahul,

    Regarding the question of who is a ‘patent attorney’ and whether a patent agent is a ‘patent attorney’, please read the article on wikipedia

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_attorney

    As you can see that in most countries, a patent agent is a ‘patent attorney’. Only the US makes a clear distinction between a patent agent and a patent attorney. However the US is famous for doing things the opposite of the rest of the world. The legal system in the US is such that the lawyers are highly educated and the decision makers (the jury) are not. The US system is designed to lead to a lot of litigation, which is great for lawyers, but not for companies. It is not an ideal model for a country like India. I think that the European model of making patent attorney firms (run by patent agents with technical degrees and not law degrees, who handle, prosecution, appeals and even litigation) would work great for India, if these patent firms also hire lawyers to complement the patent agents in drafting agreements and in litigation.

  2. Arjun says:

    An attorney is defined as someone who represents someone else in the transaction of business. By this definition, an agent is synonymous with an attorney.

    Only the specific term ‘attorney-at-law’ is used to mean lawyer.

  3. Rahul Dev says:

    Dear Arjun

    Thank you for your comments.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: